3

   Once you have something that you've always wanted, why is it that you never use it? When I was younger, I always wanted one of those bouncer balls that has a handle that you can use to hop around on, but when I got it I literally only use it for two days. Why is that? Is it that our vision of the actual object is obscured by our desire for it or is it just an occurrence of nature? And, with this in mind, how can we tell the difference between legitimately wanting something and wanting the desire for that something satisfied? Because that's what it is, usually, it's not us genuinely wanting something but rather us wanting the desire for that object fulfilled… I wonder would it work to fill that desire with something other than the specific item we want; for example, in my case of wanting the bouncer ball, would my desire for that ball have gone away if I had gotten some other prestigious (at least to te child mind) plaything to fill the hole? It's just something to mull over… kind of a new twist on the "the grass is greener on the other side" bit.

       -Meredith Cloverfield

2

Sophistication is lost on Accuracy. If you give a really great answer whose syntax is strung together in the most proper way and gets your point across excellently, but it is an incorrect answer, its former sophistication is cast aside in lou of accuracy.

     -Meredith Cloverfield

1

     There seems to be a part of creation that despairetly evades discovery- like when you have something to say and you can't quite remember what it is... is it that that something you were about to think or say or remember is in some way important to Exsistance and thus mysteriously evades your discovery? Dude- I don't even know, but this seems like it makes a lot of sense. Plus, if you can't even remember what it was you were trying to remember, then hasn't Exsistance, by way of simple paradox, once again succeeded in avoiding humans notice? Because of this, making fresh, new, genuine discoveries takes legitimate skill... this is why I think there is literally no other logical choice but to believe in God- modern science- no matter how seemingly infalible- simply has to have holes in it. Despite man's seemingly superior skill in hunting down those bits aand pieces of Exsitance that that just really, really don't want to be stumbled upon, I just don't think it's plausible to believe that our current scientific beliefs are completely fool-proof.


- Meredith Cloverfield